Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights : a critical introduction [4th] (ระเบียนเลขที่ 49905)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 17569nam a22002417a 4500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20230831153009.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | s2006 eng d |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
International Standard Book Number | 0199290415 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | NALT |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
050 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER | |
Classification number | KD35.G7.1 L68C 2006 |
100 0# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Loveland, Ian |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Constitutional law, administrative law, and human rights : a critical introduction [4th] |
260 3# - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Oxford : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Oxford University Press, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2006 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | 832 p. ; |
Other physical details | 25 cm. |
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | Preface to the fourth edition --<br/>About the online resource centre --<br/>Table of legislation --<br/>Table of treaties and conventions --<br/>List of cases --<br/>I DEFINING THE CONSTITUTION? --<br/>I. The meaning(s) of 'democracy"? --<br/>II. The first 'modern' constitution? --<br/>The problem - majoritarianism --<br/>The solutions - representative government, federalism, --<br/> separation of powers, and supra-legislative 'fundamental' rights --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>2 PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY --<br/>Pre-1688-natural or divine law 201 --<br/>The Diceyan (or orthodox) theory doll --<br/>The political source of parliamentary sovereignty the 'Glorious Revolution --<br/>1. Legal authority for the principle of parliamentary sovereignty--<br/> Substance or procedure? The enrolled bill rule --<br/>The doctrine of implied repeal Inconsistency with international law --<br/>II. Entrenching legislation - challenges to the orthodox position --<br/>Jennings' critique and the 'rule of recognition' --<br/>Is parliamentary sovereignty a British or English concept? --<br/>Women's enfranchisement Conclusion --<br/>3 THE RULE OF LAW AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS --<br/>I. The Diceyan perspective: the rule of law in the pre-welfare state--<br/> Entick v Carrington Dicey's rule of law - process or substance? --<br/>The 'independence of the judiciary' --<br/>II. The rule of law in the welfare state --<br/>Hayek - the road to serfdom --<br/>๋jones - the rule of law in the welfare stae --<br/>III. Judicial regulation of government behaviour: the --<br/>constitutional rationale --<br/>IV. Principles of statutory interpretation --<br/>Liversidge v Anderson --<br/>R v IRC, ex p Rossminster Ltd --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>V. Stare decision --<br/>VI. Parliamentary sovereignty --v the rule of law Ouster clauses - Gilmore and Anisminic --<br/>VII. Retrospective law-making --<br/>Retrospectivity in legislation - the War Damage Act 1965 --<br/>Retrospectivity at common law? Rape within marriage --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>4 THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE --<br/>The source of prerogative powers --<br/>Post 1688- the revolutionary settlement --<br/>1 The relationship between statute, the prerogative and the rule of law I. A-G v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd --<br/>Fitzgerald v Muldoon --<br/>Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade --<br/>R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union --<br/>II The traditional perspective on judicial review of prerogative powers: and its erosion --<br/>Developments in the 1960s and 1970s --<br/>III. Full reviewability - the GCHQ case--<br/> IV. Post-GCHQ developments --<br/>R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria --<br/>Police Authority (1988) --<br/>Foreign affairs? --<br/>Excluded categories: a shrinking list? --<br/>V. 'Justiciability' revisited - are all statutory powers subject to full review? --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>5 THE HOUSE OF COMMONS --<br/>Crown and Commons - the original intent and the subsequent rise of 'party' politics --<br/>The fusion of powers, the rise of the party system and Cabinet dominance of the Commons --<br/>Setting the context --<br/>The sources of the Commons' procedural rules --<br/>Resources --<br/>II. The passage of legislation --<br/>The second reading --<br/>Standing committees --<br/>Report and third reading --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>Private members' Bills --<br/>Private Bills --<br/>Hybrid Bills --<br/>Delegated legislation --<br/>'Henry VIII clauses' --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>III. Controlling the executive --<br/>Motions on the floor of the house --<br/>Emergency debates and adjournment debates --<br/>Questions to Ministers --<br/>Prime Ministerial accountability on the floor of the house --<br/>Early Day Motions --<br/>Questions for written answerpolatedostogos --<br/>Informal processes --<br/>The departmental select committee system bobs --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>6 THE HOUSE OF LORDS --<br/>I Bicameral legislatures: a functionalist justification ATM The historical background --<br/>Co-equality to complementarity: a conventional change--<br/> Lloyd George and the 'People's Budget' --<br/>The Parliament Act 1911 --<br/>The Salisbury Doctrine and the Parliament Act 1949 --<br/> II. The House of Lords in the modern era --<br/>Life Peerages --<br/>The 1968 reforms --<br/>The 1974-1979 Parliament --<br/>The House of Lords and the Thatcher governments --<br/>III. The work of the House of Lords today --<br/>Deliberation --<br/>Revision of legislation --<br/>Control of delegated legislation --<br/>Scrutiny of the executive --<br/>IV. The 1999 reforms --<br/>The 'reformed' House of Lords --<br/>The recommendations of the Wakeham Commission --<br/>The 2001 White Paper --<br/>One Parliament or three: Jackson v Attorney-General --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>7 THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM --<br/>The evolution of a 'democratic' electoral system? I--<br/>. The Great Reform Act 1832 --<br/>Chartism and the pursuit of a 'democratic' electoral system --<br/>The 1867-1884 reforms: towards a universal 'right' to vote and a 'fair' electoral contest --<br/>Gender discrimination: women's right to vote --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>II The contemporary electoral process --<br/>Apportionment - drawing constituency boundaries --<br/>The contents and conduct of election campaigns --<br/>Counting the vote --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>8 PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE --<br/>Article of the Bill of Rights 1689 --<br/>I The admission, retention and expulsion of members --<br/>Ashby v White revisited --<br/>Paty's Case --<br/>John Wilkes --<br/>Charles Bradlaugh dabro to a --<br/>Freedom from imprisonment, arrest and molestation --<br/>II. The principle of informed consent? --<br/>III. The justiciability of 'proceedings in parliament' --<br/>Actions in defamation --<br/>What are 'proceedings in Parliament'? --<br/>'Redefining Parliament' - Pepper v Hart --<br/>IV. 'Contempt' of the House --<br/>The 1967 report of the Privileges Committee --<br/>The regulation of MPs' ethical standards --<br/>V. The Register of Members' Interests --<br/>'Cash for questions' and the report of the Nolan Commission --<br/>The Defamation Act 1996 s 13 and the Hamilton libel actions --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>9 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS --<br/>The Diceyan perspective - laws and conventions distinguished --<br/>The functions and sources of conventions Collective ministerial responsibility--<br/> I. Confidence --<br/>Unanimity --<br/>Confidentiality--<br/>II. The Monarch --<br/>The Australian crisis of 1975 --<br/>III. Collective ministerial responsibility revisited: from Cabinet to Prime Ministerial government...? --<br/>... and back again? --<br/>IV. Individual ministerial responsibility --<br/> Issues of competence E--<br/>rrors of judgment --<br/>Issues of morality --<br/>Reforming the executive: 1 - the Parliamentary Commissioner --<br/>for Administration --<br/>Reforming the executive: 2- 'Next Steps' and privatisation --<br/>V. Can conventions become laws? 2: patriating the Canadian Constitution --<br/>Patriating the Canadian Constitution --<br/>VI. From ministerial responsibility to ministerial accountability? The Matrix-Churchill controversy --<br/>Conclusion - the conventional basis of parliamentary sovereignty? --<br/>10 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 1: CONVENTIONAL PLURALISM? --<br/>I. Localism, tradition and the 'modernisation' of local government --<br/>The Municipal Corporations Act 1835 --<br/>II. Local government's constitutional status in the early twentieth century law and convention --<br/>The physical boundaries of local authorities --<br/>III. Taxation and representation: the fiscal autonomy of local government --<br/>IV. The role of the judiciary --<br/>V. Council housing --<br/>VI. Education --<br/>The emergence of comprehensive education --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>11 LOCAL GOVERNMENT --<br/>2: LEGAL AUTHORITARIANISM? --<br/>'Authoritarian populism' - the ideological agenda of the Thatcher governments -<br/>I. Financial 'reform' 1: Grant penalties and ratecapping Ratecapping --<br/>II. Collective politics and individual rights: the judicial role --<br/>'Fares Fair': Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council --<br/>Wheeler v Leicester City Council --<br/> R v Lewisham London Borough Council, ex p Shell UK Ltd --<br/>Section 17 of the Local Government Act 1988 --<br/>III. Institutional and ideological reform --<br/>The abolition of the GLC and the metropolitan counties --<br/>IV. Privatising local government --<br/>The Widdicombe Report --<br/>Housing-individuated and collective privatisation --<br/>The management of state schools --<br/>V. Financial 'reform' 2: The Community Chargeveland --<br/>A step too far? The demise of the poll tax --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>VI. The Blair government's reforms --<br/>The Local Government Acts 1999 and 2000 --<br/>The governance of London --<br/>Conclusion- from ambivalence to intolerance? --<br/>12 THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY 1957-1986 --<br/>I. The Treaty of Rome --<br/>1: Founding principles --<br/>The types of EEC law and law-making processes --<br/>The status of EC law within the legal systems of the Member States --<br/>Questions of accessibility 1: the 'direct effect' of Treaty articles --<br/>Questions of hierarchy 1: the 'precedence' or 'supremacy' of Treaty articles over domestic legislation --<br/>Laws, conventions and 'ultimate political facts': the 'empty chair crisis' and the Luxembourg Accords --<br/>Questions of accessibility and hierarchy 2: The direct effect and --<br/>precedence of decisions, regulations and directives --<br/>Member State judicial reaction to the direct effect and precedence of --<br/>EEC law --<br/>Conclusion U --<br/>II. nited Kingdom accession --<br/>EEC membership and parliamentary sovereignty: the legislators' views - and their votes --<br/>The European Communities Act 1972 - the passage --<br/>The European Communities Act 1972 - the terms --<br/>Parliamentary sovereignty: a non-justiciable concept? --<br/>The 1975 referendum --<br/>III. The Treaty of Rome 2: precedence and direct effect revisited --<br/>Confirming the direct effect of directives --<br/>The horizontal direct effect of Treaty articles - Walrave v Kochi T The justiciability test and the horizontal direct effect principle reaffirmed and expanded - Defrenne v SABENA --<br/>Immediate precedence: Simmenthal --<br/>Effet utile before the Conseil D'Etat: the Cohn-Bendit controversy --<br/>IV. EEC Law, parliamentary sovereignty and the UK courts: phase one --<br/>The end of the doctrine of implied repeal? Macarthys v Smith --<br/>A matter of interpretation? Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd --<br/>V. Direct effect - the saga continues Con --<br/>The horizontal and vertical direct effect of directives? Marshall v --<br/>Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority --<br/>Making sense of Marshall? The emergence of 'indirect effect' loggent --<br/>An analytical overview: 'normative' and 'decisional' supra-nationalism --<br/>The reduction of the 'democratic deficit' and the emergence of human --<br/>rights as general principles of EEC law Conclusion --<br/>13 THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AFTER THE SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT --<br/>I. The Single European Act the terms --<br/>Reducing the democratic deficit - Treaty amendment --<br/>Domestic disquiet: Margaret Thatcher's Bruges speech --<br/>II. Normative supra-nationalism - the ECJ continues --<br/>The 'indirect effect' of directives - continued --<br/>Reducing the democratic deficit: judicial initiatives --<br/>III. EC Law, parliamentary sovereignty and the UK courts: phase two --<br/>Duke v GEC Reliance Ltd --<br/>Pickstone v Freemans --<br/>Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Co Ltd --<br/>Pickstone and Litster - usurping the legislative function? --<br/>IV. The end of parliamentary sovereignty: Or its reappearance? --<br/>The demise of the legal doctrine? Factortame --<br/>The reappearance of the political doctrine? Monetary union, collective ministerial responsibility and the fall of Margaret Thatcher --<br/>V. The Francovich remedy<br/>Francovich --<br/>VI. Maastricht and Amsterdam --<br/>The terms of the Maastricht Treaty --<br/>The ratification and incorporation of the Maastricht Treaty --<br/>The Treaty of Amsterdam Conclusion --<br/>14 SUBSTANTIVE GROUNDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: ILLEGALITY, IRRATIONALITY AND PROPORTIONALITY --<br/>I. Illegality --<br/>Excess of powers --<br/>Unlawful delegation of powers --<br/>Fettering of discretion --<br/>Estoppel --<br/>11. Irrationality --<br/>III. Proportionality - a new ground of review? --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>15 PROCEDURAL GROUNDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW--<br/> I. Audi alterem partem - the right to a fair hearing --<br/>The initial rise, dilution and fall of the audi alterem partem principle --<br/>The re-emergence of the principle? Ridge v Baldwin 610 --<br/>The emergence of the procedural fairness doctrine and the appearance of the legitimate expectation --<br/>Legitimate expectation - an entitlement to a procedural benefit or substantive benefit? --<br/>The content of procedural fairness - legal representation and an ase o obligation to give reasons for decisions --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>II. The rule against bias --<br/>Direct financial interests --<br/>Indirect financial interests - a mere suspicion or a real likelihood? --<br/>Clarifying the law? The Gough formulae --<br/>Ideological bias in 'judicial' decisions --<br/>Further clarifying the law? The Porter v Magill formula --<br/>Bias in non-judicial proceedings --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>16 THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW --<br/>The turning point? Barnard v National Dock Labour Board Tusco lo --<br/>The Order 53 reforms 67% --<br/>The initial Order 53 case law --<br/>I. O'Reilly v Mackman --<br/>Exceptions to the general principle? --<br/>II. The post-O'Reilly case law --<br/>he flip side of the O'Reilly coin --<br/>A 'nature' not 'source' of power test - the Datafin, Aga Khan and Wachmann decisions --<br/>III. Retreating from O'Reilly? The Roy case --<br/>IV. Public law principle as a defence in criminal proceedings --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>17 LOCUS STANDI --<br/>The 'old' case law --<br/>Declaration and injunction - a restrictive test? --<br/>Certiorari and prohibition - an expansive test? --<br/>Mandamus-broad or narrow test? --<br/>II. Section 31(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and the Inland --<br/>Revenue Commissioners case --<br/>Standing in the private law stream --<br/>III. Post-IRC developments --<br/>Representative standing' --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>18 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES 1: TRADITIONAL PERSPECTIVES --<br/>I. Public protest and public order --<br/>The classic dilemma - Beatty v Gillbanks --<br/>The Public Order Act 1936 --<br/>The Public Order Act 1986 --<br/>II. Privacy S--<br/>peech and communication --<br/>Sado-masochistic sexual behaviour --<br/>III. Freedom of speech --<br/>Official secrecy --<br/>The Official Secrets Act 1989 --<br/>Blasphemy --<br/>Contempt of court --<br/>Political libels --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>19 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES II:EMERGENT PRINCIPLES --<br/>I. The European Convention on Human Rights --<br/>introductory principles --<br/>Institutional and jurisdictional issues --<br/>The jurisprudential methodology of the Convention --<br/>II. The initial status of the ECHR in domestic law --<br/>Political responses - why did Parliament not incorporate the ECHR? --<br/>Legal responses - the ECHR as a source of principle at common law --<br/>III. The impact of the ECHR on domestic law 1: privacy --<br/>Speech and communication --<br/>Sado-masochistic sexual behaviour --<br/>IV. The impact of the ECHR on domestic law 2: freedom of expression --<br/>Official secrecy --<br/>Political libels --<br/>Contempt of court --<br/>Blasphemy --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>20 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES II: NEW SUBSTANTIVE GROUNDS OF REVIEW --<br/>I. Judicial incorporation of the Convention --<br/>The Convention in domestic law --<br/>II. The (re-)emergence and consolidation of fundamental human rights as an indigenous principle of common law --<br/>Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd in the House of Lords --<br/>R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Leech --<br/>R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex p Joint Council for the --<br/>Welfare of Immigrants --<br/>III. The judicial supremacism' controversy--<br/> Judgments of the ECJ and the ECtHR --<br/>Judgments in domestic courts on immigration policies A--<br/> judicial response --<br/>Lord Mustill's analysis Conclusion --<br/>21 HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IV: THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 --<br/>I. The terms of the Act --<br/>An incorporation of fundamental rights? --<br/>Section 3 new rules of statutory interpretation? --<br/>Section 4 - the 'Declaration of Incompatibility --<br/>Section 6- the reach of the Act: vertical (and horizontal?) direct effect --<br/>A special status for churches and the press? --<br/>Questions of procedure --<br/>On the separation of powers --<br/>Political entrenchment? A new 'rights' culture within government --<br/>and Parliament --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>II. The initial impact of the Human Rights Act --<br/>The approach to statutory interpretation mandated by s 3 and the use of declarations of incompatibility --<br/>The notion of 'deference' to legislative judgment --<br/>The horizontality of the Act --<br/>Proportionality as a ground of review of executive action --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>22 SCOTS AND WELSH DEVOLUTION --<br/>The Scotland Act 1978 and the Wales Act 1978 --<br/>I. The Scotland Act 1998 --<br/>The terms of the Act --<br/>The first Scottish Parliament and government Conclusion II. The Government of Wales Act 1998 --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>23 CONCLUSION - ENTRENCHMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL LAW REVISITED --<br/>I. Issues of legality and legitimacy --<br/>Questions of legitimacy --<br/>Conclusion --<br/>Bibliography --<br/>Index.<br/> <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> |
650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Constitutional law -- Great Britain |
650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Human rights |
650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Administration law |
650 04 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Constitutional law -- Australia |
850 ## - HOLDING INSTITUTION | |
Holding institution | NALT |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Law Book |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Library of Congress Classification |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 4574 |
-- | ฐานิสา คำพันธ์ |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Home library | Current library | Cost, normal purchase price | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Cost, replacement price | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Law Book collection | National Assembly Library of Thailand | National Assembly Library of Thailand | 2298.00 | KD 35.G7.1 L68C 2006 | 3961163123 | 22/06/2017 | 2348.00 | 09/06/2017 | Law Book |